Evidence-based supplements & herbs for Gout & Uric Acid | Suppev
Evidence by health condition

Nutrients, herbs & natural products studied for Gout & Uric Acid

14 PubMed clinical trials & meta-analyses analyzed

AI summary

Evidence stage: Meta-Analysis

The abstracts describe a small and heterogeneous evidence base for gout and uric acid outcomes, ranging from randomized trials to systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The strongest recurring theme is Chinese herbal medicine used externally or as formula compounds, with multiple reviews reporting improvements in pain, overall efficacy, inflammation, and uric acid-related outcomes in acute gouty arthritis. One randomized trial also reported that Zhifang I Decoction decreased serum uric acid in people with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease complicated by hyperuricemia. Outside herbal compounds, vitamin D and alpha-lipoic acid were studied in unrelated populations and did not show significant uric acid changes in the reported abstracts, while nicotinic acid was observed to increase plasma uric acid. This evidence is educational; it is not FDA-approved and is not medical advice.

Doses are those reported in the studies, not recommendations. Talk to your doctor before taking anything.

Chinese herbal compounds (external use for acute gouty arthritis)

HerbModerate evidenceMeta-Analysis

Doses studied: Not specified in abstract

Duration: Not specified

A 2023 systematic review/meta-analysis included 27 randomized controlled trials with 1951 participants and evaluated total effective rate, uric acid level, pain score, and inflammatory factors such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein. Across the pooled studies, the external-use herbal medicine groups showed significantly better outcomes than western medicine controls for pain, inflammation, and uric acid levels. Side effects were reported in some studies, and when reported, the intervention groups had fewer complications than controls.

Chinese herbal compounds (acute gouty arthritis, oral/combined Chinese herbal formulas)

HerbModerate evidenceMeta-Analysis

Doses studied: Not specified in abstract

Duration: Not specified

A 2025 systematic review/meta-analysis included 28 studies with 2100 participants and found that Chinese herbal compounds improved overall efficacy compared with conventional western medicine. The meta-analysis also reported improvement in visual analogue scale scores and serum uric acid levels, with the evidence graded as very low. Blood sedimentation-related outcomes were also assessed, but the abstract is truncated before all details are listed.

+7 more compounds studied

Unlock every compound with doses, duration, findings and sources.

Unlock with Premium
Suppev

The #1 Real Supplement Evidence App

SUPPEV is an educational platform providing scientific evidence summaries. It does not diagnose, treat, prevent, or cure any disease. Consult a healthcare professional before supplement use.

© 2026 Suppev · PubMed / NCBI · WADA

We use cookies to keep you signed in, remember your language and improve Suppev. See our Privacy Policy.